Biannual iStat Patient Correlations - Hct

6 followers
0 Likes

Hi everyone,

I was wondering if anyone else has experienced issues with their istats and comparing them to other instruments, especially for Hct. We use CG8+ cartridges (blood gas, electrolytes, glucose, and hgb/hct). For the hematology portion, we compare to our hospital's DxHs.

I have noticed that the istat gives hct values on average anywhere between 2-4% lower than the DxH hct. We initially thought because we had the settings in the DE server to K3EDTA, that was the issue. So we changed that setting to K2EDTA (which our hospital uses), and are still experiencing the same issue.

If you experienced a similar issue or know of a possible solution, I would love to know!

Thank you,
Emily

7 Replies

Emily,  Our comparison has been good because we use Chem8+.  They use them in ER.  Patients there have not had any IV lines connected to them yet. A lot of times the doctor orders a basic metabolic panel and turns around and order Comprehensive panel to be done in the lab.  I use those duplicate results for my comparison. I collect these data and calculate them in June and December. I think comparing them all year round has an advantage.  I usually end up with 15-20 data samples which is better when calculating statistics.  One can detect any problem  ( if trending) with the i-STAT instead of just doing the comparison all at one time.   Our Surgery use CG8+ for their Open Heart Surgery.  The samples are not the best especially if they are hooked up to machines  and infusions that alter their blood samples.  We had that problem before until we decided that they cannot use the i-STAT HCT for transfusion. They can look at the HCT and monitor it. We have to run the sample in our main lab analyzer if they need transfusion. 

We also have issues with the H&H on our Istat's comparing to our main analyzers.  All of our Istat Blood gas results go out with the following comment- "ISTAT methodology for Hgb and Hct produces results less accurate than conventional laboratory methods.  ISTAT Hemoglobin and Hematocrit results may vary from those of laboratory methods by up to 2g/dL (Hgb) and by up to 4% (Hct).  Interpret results carefully and in correlation with overall patient condition."

We have had issues with the i-STAT Hemoglobin compared to the lab.  We use the comment "Point of Care Testing methodology intended for rapid screening purposes only.  Actual hemoglobin results may vary up to +/- 3 g/dL.  Clinical correlation required."

We too have seen this occasionally at our facility when comparing CG8s and our DxH.  If we see an exception during correlations, we include the statement "Hgb and Hct correlation results in Open Heart can run 2-4% lower than the Lab analyzer due to CPB mode and other factors. This difference would not change any clinical decisions. Results may not correlate within limits; alternate testing must be obtained for transfusion decisions.".

Thank you everyone for all of your responses. 

So when you do your biannual comparisons, your laboratory director will conditionally sign off that the hct values will be outside the typical total allowable error of 6% ?

Depends on how far out the comparisons are.  I have been asked to run more samples.

We do not use the H&H on the iSTAT at all but 1 location for this reason. It does not compare well at all to lab instrumentation. We leave it on at our off site NICU for screening purposes. 

Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Emily VonLinsowe
over 3 years ago
7
Replies
0
Likes
6
Followers
87
Views
Liked By:
Suggested Posts
TopicRepliesLikesViewsParticipantsLast Reply
Piccolo express
Deborah Martuch, MT(ASCP), CPP
about 2 years ago
30248
Deborah Martuch, MT(ASCP), CPP
about 2 years ago
Quantra
Ashlee Byquist
about 2 years ago
50326
Ashlee Byquist
about 2 years ago
PPM Procedures/Resources
Jennifer Toncray
about 2 years ago
50242
Jennifer Toncray
about 2 years ago