Additional Instruments (Waived)
7 followers
0 Likes
We currently perform A1C on the DCA Vantage and UAs on the Clinitek Status. When we get additional instruments (waived testing), do we need to do any type of verification? I believe the current practice is too intensive for waived...it involves basically a correlation between the core lab and an established instrument, QC, etc. COM.30980 doesn't mention anything that CAP requires other than to do what the manufacturer recommends. (I can't find anything from the manufacturer for either as far as QC or anything goes).
Does anyone with either of these instruments mind sharing what they do when they get an additional or replacement instrument?
Thank you!!!!
Does anyone with either of these instruments mind sharing what they do when they get an additional or replacement instrument?
Thank you!!!!
6 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Suggested Posts
Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Piccolo express | 3 | 0 | 254 | ||
Quantra | 5 | 0 | 334 | ||
PPM Procedures/Resources | 5 | 0 | 251 |
As you have mentioned, there are no CAP/CLIA requirements for test method verification / clinical claims validation of waived tests. The regulatory requirements simply state to follow manufacturer's instructions. Note: more stringent state/local requirements may exist.
First step would be to reach out to the manufacturer to see if they have a "recommended" verification plan for new devices. You should also verify in the IFU to ensure there is no mention of recommended studies prior to use.
If no recommendation from the manufacturer/IFU, next it would be up to the laboratory director to decide what is necessary. At the minimum, their signature/approval on the procedure is all that is needed (REF: COM.30980 "The laboratory director's signature on the written test procedure may be used to show approval of the test for use in patient testing.").
We created a specific, medical director signed policy to define how we verify additional waived devices. Our process is to run 3 normal controls and 3 abnormal controls. If the results are numerical we calculate the mean, SD and CV, which must fall within our policy's stated acceptable range. If the values are non-numeric the policy states all values must fall with manufacturer's stated range (Ex. detected/not detected). We have a waived device verification worksheet associated with the policy that we complete, sign and keep on file for each additional device. I could share the policy and worksheet if you'd like to review them?
For glucose meters, QC is performed and if acceptable the meter is put into use.
Could you share your policy and worksheet in the File section? If not, I would love a copy also.
sandrabijani@uh.org
Thank you!