I-Stat or other testing options for Anesthesia Department
9 followers
0 Likes
Our anesthesia department is interested in looking at the I-Stat for bedside testing. They stated that they were mostly needing chemistries and H&H. Potentially they may need ABGs. Anyone have the I-Stats for Anesthesia used for these tests? Or recommend another POC device we could look into? Trying to find the best solution and potentially a waived testing platform as that would be easiest to monitor.
8 Replies
Reply
Subgroup Membership is required to post Replies
Join POCT Listserv now
Suggested Posts
Topic | Replies | Likes | Views | Participants | Last Reply |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Piccolo express | 3 | 0 | 247 | ||
Quantra | 5 | 0 | 326 | ||
PPM Procedures/Resources | 5 | 0 | 242 |
Again, thanks for all the responses!
I'll chime in with a few suggestions. First, you won't find a waived platform that will include chemistries, H/H and blood gas, it just doesn't exist. Second, although we did not have iSTAT in our facility in an intraoperative/anesthesia setting, we did have a device that also uses a conductivity-based hematocrit method, like iSTAT does. What complicates the anesthesia setting is often the frequent infusion of plasma supplements/additives that can make conductivity-based assessments unreliable. We had too much discrepancy between these readings and actual measured H/H samples obtained in the lab. We opted for Radiometer ABL90s, which give an actual measured (not calculated) hemoglobin. No issues, no effect from plasma infusions. Other win is no IQCP required, because the q8H internal QC follows the same path as a patient sample. Attaching a link here to an article about conductivity-based hematocrits. Intravenous fluids cause systemic bias in a conductivity-based point-of-care hematocrit meter - PubMed (nih.gov)
As far as benchtop POC analyzers go, we have some other hospitals in our delivery network that use the GEM 5000's and really like them-- from what I hear they are expensive, but less maintenance than an ABL.
We looked at Siemens epoc a couple years ago when the FDA pulled a bunch of Abbotts cartridges. It was a similar option to the iSTAT, but the design of the cards meant less storage issues. The cards are kept at room temp--unlike the iSTAT cartridges which are refrigerated (once brought to RT the CG8 is good for 2 months). This certainly would have reduced the POC oversite over the supplies which would have been a plus.
If so- do you find the Istat has better reproducibility?